College juice gets anonymous

The College Anonymous Confession Board is a self-proclaimed classier version of the defunct Juicy Campus.

A new Web site is quickly becoming the new online home for anonymous gossip after the collapse of Juicy Campus due to the recent economic downturn.

The College Anonymous Confession Board gives students freedom to voice their opinions on topics ranging from sex and keg parties to campus life and politics, and now Temple students can gossip on the site.

The Web site, created by recent college grads Andrew Mann of John Hopkins University and Aaron Larner of Wesleyan University, serves as a platform for discussions that may be considered taboo by many.

The site is now run by Wesleyan freshman Peter Frank, who was given control of ACB when the two creators couldn’t find time to continue to run it.

In an e-mail, Frank said ACB differs from previous sites such as Juicy Campus because it provides a forum for real discussions rather than malicious topics.

“We have found that our students use our site to discuss topics that might be difficult to talk about in person,” he said, “as well as ask questions about classes or school events.”

In a press release, ACB said its philosophy is different from that of Juicy Campus, because the previous was a site that “fostered superficial interactions” which were “often derogatory and needlessly crude.”

Frank said there is always room for the occasional gossip post, but that his site will consistently host a higher level of operation.

Junior communications major Katherine McCombs said gossip sites ruin people’s reputations and she doesn’t use them.

“If you go on there you know you’re looking for trouble or for yourself,” McCombs said.

ACB users don’t have to login to make a post, but once a user is logged in, they can take advantage of additional features such as private messaging, identity swapping and marking private threads to view later.

Frank said he hopes users will get a more personal experience from the individual college boards.

Users to ACB can help the site maintain their images by getting involved in the moderation process. Users are given a few loose rules regarding libel and are able to report posts they don’t like.

f a student finds a statement they consider libelous, they may report it to the administrator who will remove the post if it violates the site’s terms of agreement. By doing this, the site has been able to avoid the vast number of libelous seen on other gossip sites.

But users beware – the site is not legally responsible for any libel posted on ACB because of Section 240 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.

Juicy Campus was highly criticized for not censoring its content posted by users. The site was founded in August 2007, and, by October 2008, was spreading gossip to more than 500 colleges and universities. CEO Matt Investor said in a press release that the site ran dry after plummeting revenue from online advertisers and the “economic downturn.” The site was permanently shut-down Feb. 5.

Frank said in the wake of the recent Juicy Campus shut-down, he doesn’t fear that his site will do the same and that his site is getting about 500,000 impressions daily.

“Users should look for new features in the coming month,” Frank said. “We don’t want to release too many details, but we believe they will be exciting.”

Matthew D. Wargo can be reached at mdwargo@temple.edu.

3 Comments

  1. I think, that Andrew Mann, and Aaron Larner made a huge mistake. I do not believe that they created it with the beliefs that it will be different than juicy campus. I have checked it out, and although so far it is not as horrible and as offensive, it is on it’s way to being the next juicy campus. Why anyone would want to create another “juicy campus” is beyond me. I feel that the only reason someone would create a website like this, is because they like seeing people suffer, and like seeing people’s reputation being ruined. Although, I have never been posted about on any such site, I’ve had many friends on there that have been severely degraded. This statement was said in the above article: We have found that our students use our site to discuss topics that might be difficult to talk about in person,” he said, “as well as ask questions about classes or school events.” It is true about one thing, students use this new site to discuss topics that might be difficult to discuss. I mean you wouldn’t normally go up to people and tell them that they’re animals and sluts and whores and I could go on and on, with all the nasty stuff said about people. So why not bash someone where everyone can see it!? Let’s let the world know that Jane has herpes and is a huge slut. Seriously, the men who created this new website should really get a life and grow up. They’re college graduates, high school is over dearies, it’s about time you learn that.

Leave a Reply to Laura Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*